Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Young primary students making sense of text and illustrations about how refuse can become soil

  • University of Borås
  • University of Gothenburg
  • Kristianstad University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Explanatory pictures and models are frequently used in teaching and learning situations. However, it seems to be simply assumed that they are always beneficial. In this article results from an investigation with 16 Swedish pupils aged 7–9 year are presented based on an analysis that has examined how well this assumption holds up. Concepts from multi-modal theory have been used to investigate how young learners deal with illustrations and text from an early reader booklet about composting domestic refuse. The analysis suggests that expectations that illustrations facilitate the meaning-making of young pupils may be exaggerated. Although the booklet claimed to provide interactive support between image and text most of the examples show pupils ignoring pictures or misinterpreting vital information about composting in both the verbal and non-verbal material. The illustrations did not compensate for the most crucial deficiencies in the written text.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1150-1168
Number of pages19
JournalEnvironmental Education Research
Volume23
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 14 Sep 2017
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education
  2. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

Keywords

  • environmental education
  • illustrations as support to text
  • making of meaning composting refuse
  • young primary students

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Young primary students making sense of text and illustrations about how refuse can become soil'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this