Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Understanding the diffusion of AI-generative (ChatGPT) in higher education: Does students' integrity matter?

  • Mohamed Bouteraa
  • , Saeed Awadh Bin-Nashwan
  • , Meshari Al-Daihani
  • , Khadar Ahmed Dirie
  • , Abderrahim Benlahcene
  • , Mouad Sadallah
  • , Hafizah Omar Zaki
  • , Suddin Lada
  • , Rudy Ansar
  • , Lim Ming Fook
  • , Brahim Chekima
  • American University of Afghanistan (AUAF)
  • Dhofar University
  • University of Malaya
  • University Utara Malaysia
  • University of Hail
  • Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Universiti Malaysia Sabah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

115 Scopus citations

Abstract

ChatGPT, an AI-powered language model, is revolutionising the academic world. Scholars, researchers, and students use its advanced capabilities to achieve their educational objectives, including generating innovative ideas, delivering assignments, and conducting extensive research projects. Nevertheless, the use of ChatGPT among students is contentious, giving rise to significant apprehensions regarding integrity and AI-facilitated deceit. At the same time, scholarly communities currently need more well-defined standards for adopting such academia-oriented technology. This study aims to determine students' use of ChatGPT using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), notably the role of students' integrity in determining adoption behaviour. The analysis of 921 responses demonstrated that the utilisation of ChatGPT is influenced positively by performance expectancy, social influence, educational self-efficacy, technology self-efficacy, and personal anxiety. Conversely, student integrity was found to negatively impact usage. Remarkably, student integrity has a positive moderating effect between effort expectancy and ChatGPT usage. At the same time, it has a negative moderating effect on the link between performance expectancy and technology self-efficacy with ChatGPT usage. Hence, we propose that the academic community, AI language model developers, publishers, and relevant stakeholders collaborate to establish explicit rules for the utilisation of AI chatbots in an ethical manner for educational purposes.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100402
JournalComputers in Human Behavior Reports
Volume14
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2024

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence students integrity
  • ChatGPT
  • Chatbots
  • SCT
  • UTAUT

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding the diffusion of AI-generative (ChatGPT) in higher education: Does students' integrity matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this