Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers

Pharmacy Practice 2017 peer reviewers

doi:10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236

Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers

Pharmacy Practice 2017 peer reviewers

University of Lisbon
University of Wisconsin
Parkland Health & Hospital System
King Faisal University
Jazan University
Ohio Northern University
King Saud University
University of Iowa
State University of Tetovo
Sports Medicine Association of Serbia
Wayne State University
UCSI University
Khon Kaen University
University of Warwick
Marshall University
Jordan University of Science and Technology
University of Technology Sydney
Tufts University
Kaiser Permanente
University of the Sciences
Northeastern University
University of Arizona
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University
University of Pittsburgh
University of Illinois at Chicago
Universiti Sains Malaysia
NorthShore University HealthSystem
Northern Care Alliance NHS Group
Chapman University
Applied Science Private University
University of Coimbra
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
University of California at Davis
Purdue University
North Dakota State University
University of Minnesota Twin Cities
Parkway Pantai
University of Tromsø – The Arctic University of Norway
North Carolina State University
University of Granada
University of Tennessee
Trinity Health Michigan
University of Colorado
Presbyterian College
The University of the West Indies
University of Sydney
Université Laval
Umm Al-Qura University
Lebanese University
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Kingston University
University of Aveiro
University of Cincinnati
Kroger
Qatar University
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
University of Copenhagen
University of Bath
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
University of East Anglia
Kuwait University
Union University
NHS Lothian
University of Belgrade
University of Pennsylvania
Hospital Queen Elizabeth
University of Queensland
Université de Sherbrooke
Universidade Federal de Sergipe
University of Hawai'i at Mānoa
University of Utah
Boston University
King Fahd Military Medical Complex
University of Toronto
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń
University of Split
McGill University
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
University of Southern California
Chulalongkorn University
University of Lagos
Navitus Health Solutions
Universidade de São Paulo
East Carolina University
University of New South Wales
University of Florida
South Georgia Veterans Health System
University of Priština (North Mitrovica)
University of Costa Rica
NHS South Sefton CCG
Ajman University
University of Zagreb
University of Mississippi
University of Alberta
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Virginia Commonwealth University
Monash University Malaysia
Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
VU University Medical Center (VUMC)
Pharmerit International
Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences
Gulf Medical University
University of Eastern Finland
Charles Darwin University
Robert Gordon University
Albany College of Pharmacy
King Abdullah International M.R.C.
Ankara University
Medical University of Gdańsk
University of California
University of New England
Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education
Campbell University
KU Leuven
University of North Texas
University of Connecticut
West Virginia University
University of Malta
University of Otago
Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous for the future of scholarly publishing. And, why not acknowledging their contribution to the final version of the article published? PubMed created two categories of contributors: authors [AU] and collaborators [IR]. Why not a third category for the peer-reviewer?.

Original language	English
Article number	1236
Journal	Pharmacy Practice
Volume	16
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236
State	Published - 2018
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Open access publishing
Peer review
Peer review
Periodicals as topic
Research

Access to Document

10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236

Cite this

@article{55a110cd3e4f46cfabcbd8da5cec3e59,

title = "Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers",

abstract = "The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous for the future of scholarly publishing. And, why not acknowledging their contribution to the final version of the article published? PubMed created two categories of contributors: authors [AU] and collaborators [IR]. Why not a third category for the peer-reviewer?.",

keywords = "Open access publishing, Peer review, Peer review, Periodicals as topic, Research",

author = "\{Pharmacy Practice 2017 peer reviewers\} and Fernando Fernandez-Llimos and Berti, \{Andrew D.\} and Denise Yeung and Yusuff, \{Kazeem B.\} and \{El Zowalaty\}, \{Mohamed E.\} and Adane, \{Eyob D.\} and Sinaa Al-Aqeel and Al-Jumaili, \{Ali Azeez\} and Edita Alili-Idrizi and Marija Andelkovic and Anil Aranha and Mohammad Arief and Wiwat Arkaravichien and Xavier Armoiry and Attarabeen, \{Omar F.\} and Nehad Ayoub and Bajorek, \{Beata V.\} and Paul Beninger and Billups, \{Sarah J.\} and Bowen, \{Jane F.\} and Carla Bouwmeester and Patrick Campbell and Vincent Chan and Connor, \{Sharon E.\} and Danziger, \{Larry H.\} and Dawood, \{Omar T.\} and Mark Dunnenberger and Selwa Elrouby and Souhiela Fakih and \{Abu Farha\}, \{Rana K.\} and Figueiredo, \{Isabel V.\} and Nazanin Foroutan and Forsythe, \{Lauren E.\} and Frail, \{Caitlin K.\} and Dan Friesner and Kylie Funk and Caroline Gaither and Gallimore, \{Casey E.\} and Vincent Gan and Garcia, \{Beate H.\} and Gaskins, \{Jessica L.\} and Gastelurrutia, \{Miguel A.\} and Justin Gatwood and Genord, \{Cheryl K.\} and Eric Gilliam and Goodbar, \{Nancy Hope\} and Maxine Gossell-Williams and Quinn Grundy and Line Gu{\'e}nette and Subish Palaian",

year = "2018",

doi = "10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236",

language = "English",

volume = "16",

journal = "Pharmacy Practice",

issn = "1885-642X",

publisher = "Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers

AU - Pharmacy Practice 2017 peer reviewers

AU - Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando

AU - Berti, Andrew D.

AU - Yeung, Denise

AU - Yusuff, Kazeem B.

AU - El Zowalaty, Mohamed E.

AU - Adane, Eyob D.

AU - Al-Aqeel, Sinaa

AU - Al-Jumaili, Ali Azeez

AU - Alili-Idrizi, Edita

AU - Andelkovic, Marija

AU - Aranha, Anil

AU - Arief, Mohammad

AU - Arkaravichien, Wiwat

AU - Armoiry, Xavier

AU - Attarabeen, Omar F.

AU - Ayoub, Nehad

AU - Bajorek, Beata V.

AU - Beninger, Paul

AU - Billups, Sarah J.

AU - Bowen, Jane F.

AU - Bouwmeester, Carla

AU - Campbell, Patrick

AU - Chan, Vincent

AU - Connor, Sharon E.

AU - Danziger, Larry H.

AU - Dawood, Omar T.

AU - Dunnenberger, Mark

AU - Elrouby, Selwa

AU - Fakih, Souhiela

AU - Abu Farha, Rana K.

AU - Figueiredo, Isabel V.

AU - Foroutan, Nazanin

AU - Forsythe, Lauren E.

AU - Frail, Caitlin K.

AU - Friesner, Dan

AU - Funk, Kylie

AU - Gaither, Caroline

AU - Gallimore, Casey E.

AU - Gan, Vincent

AU - Garcia, Beate H.

AU - Gaskins, Jessica L.

AU - Gastelurrutia, Miguel A.

AU - Gatwood, Justin

AU - Genord, Cheryl K.

AU - Gilliam, Eric

AU - Goodbar, Nancy Hope

AU - Gossell-Williams, Maxine

AU - Grundy, Quinn

AU - Guénette, Line

AU - Palaian, Subish

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous for the future of scholarly publishing. And, why not acknowledging their contribution to the final version of the article published? PubMed created two categories of contributors: authors [AU] and collaborators [IR]. Why not a third category for the peer-reviewer?.

AB - The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous for the future of scholarly publishing. And, why not acknowledging their contribution to the final version of the article published? PubMed created two categories of contributors: authors [AU] and collaborators [IR]. Why not a third category for the peer-reviewer?.

KW - Open access publishing

KW - Peer review

KW - Periodicals as topic

KW - Research

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85056509328

U2 - 10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236

DO - 10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236

M3 - Editorial

AN - SCOPUS:85056509328

SN - 1885-642X

VL - 16

JO - Pharmacy Practice

JF - Pharmacy Practice

IS - 1

M1 - 1236

ER -

Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this