Abstract
The criteria and indications for choosing either root canal treatment (RCT) or a single-tooth implant (STI) are debatable and may vary from one patient to the other. In general, the preference of choosing a treatment plan is dependent on various factors including clinical considerations, experience, and opinion of the operator. In either case, the purpose of treatment is the same; restoring the esthetic, functional components and quality of patients- life. Both endodontic treatment and single-tooth implant therapy showed a promising outcome with a similar success rate. The implant restorations need comparatively more postoperative intervention compared to the endodontically treated teeth. A tooth with questionable prognosis for endodontic treatment may have a higher risk of failure and can be treated by endodontics; however, may not be utilized in case of long-span fixed bridges. Therefore, every case should be assessed carefully considering individual variations, patient-s history, and radiographic and clinical examination. This chapter aims to demonstrate a systematic procedure and criteria associated with decision making regarding endodontics and implants treatment alternatives, based on currently available pieces of evidence.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Dental Implants |
| Subtitle of host publication | Materials, Coatings, Surface Modifications and Interfaces with Oral Tissues |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Pages | 37-48 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780128195864 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780128196274 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Endodontics
- Outcome
- Peri-implantitis
- Prognosis
- Restoration
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Root canal treatment versus single-tooth implant'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver