Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Rapid Scoping Review of Stent Outcomes for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Leaks: A Need for Definitions, Clarity, and Predictive Models

  • Alexandria University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

The evidence base of the outcomes of stent placement for post-metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) leaks appears inconsistent. Using three electronic databases, we undertook a scoping review of the literature to identify reasons why this could be the case. Twenty-one published items were included. We observed discrepancies pertaining to definitions of stent success/failure, time frames used for such definitions, characteristics of calculating and reporting stent outcome rates, and inconsistent predictors of stent success, and there were no predictive models of post-MBS stent outcomes. Potential solutions are proposed to these challenges as initial steps to standardized definitions, more clarity, and predictive models rendering calculation of rates and their comparisons more accurate. Attention to these could contribute to a rigorous evidence of stent outcomes and their predictors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)305-318
Number of pages14
JournalObesity Surgery
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rapid Scoping Review of Stent Outcomes for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Leaks: A Need for Definitions, Clarity, and Predictive Models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this