TY - GEN
T1 - Performance Comparison among Different Chirping Methods of Fiber Bragg Grating for Dispersion Compensation
AU - Keti, Faris
AU - Abbasi, Qammer H.
AU - Imran, Muhammad Ali
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 IEEE.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - In this paper, different Fiber Bragg Grating chirping methods are compared. Fiber Bragg Grating, which is a well-known dispersion compensation component, is utilized to propose a new system model for dispersion compensation. It has been used with the Tanh apodization function and different chirp functions to provide a Chirped Fiber Bragg Grating. In addition, a low-pass Gaussian filter is added to the model to enhance its performance in terms of Q-factor, BER, and eye diagram. The comparison is made via Optisystem, whereas some results were analyzed via Python. Simulation and analytical results confirm that the Q-factor, BER, and eye diagrams of the proposed system with linear chirping show superior performance compared to other chirpings for 28km and more fiber lengths. The values of Max Q-factor and Min-BER with 40km fiber length were 29.5524 and $\mathbf{9.3407}^{\ast}\mathbf{10}^{\wedge}-\mathbf{182}$ for the proposed system with linear chirping, 26.897 and $\mathbf{5.410}^{\ast}\mathbf{10}^{\wedge}-\mathbf{135}$ with quadratic chirping, 25.263 and $\mathbf{3.531}^{\ast}\mathbf{10}^{\wedge}$- 141 with square root chirping, and 22.582 and $\mathbf{5.236}^{\ast} \mathbf{10}^{\wedge}$- 105with cubic root chirping. Finally, as 40km is the maximum link length proposed between Base-Stations and Base-Band Unit pool in C-RAN 5G networks, therefore linear chirping is the best candidate compared to other methods.
AB - In this paper, different Fiber Bragg Grating chirping methods are compared. Fiber Bragg Grating, which is a well-known dispersion compensation component, is utilized to propose a new system model for dispersion compensation. It has been used with the Tanh apodization function and different chirp functions to provide a Chirped Fiber Bragg Grating. In addition, a low-pass Gaussian filter is added to the model to enhance its performance in terms of Q-factor, BER, and eye diagram. The comparison is made via Optisystem, whereas some results were analyzed via Python. Simulation and analytical results confirm that the Q-factor, BER, and eye diagrams of the proposed system with linear chirping show superior performance compared to other chirpings for 28km and more fiber lengths. The values of Max Q-factor and Min-BER with 40km fiber length were 29.5524 and $\mathbf{9.3407}^{\ast}\mathbf{10}^{\wedge}-\mathbf{182}$ for the proposed system with linear chirping, 26.897 and $\mathbf{5.410}^{\ast}\mathbf{10}^{\wedge}-\mathbf{135}$ with quadratic chirping, 25.263 and $\mathbf{3.531}^{\ast}\mathbf{10}^{\wedge}$- 141 with square root chirping, and 22.582 and $\mathbf{5.236}^{\ast} \mathbf{10}^{\wedge}$- 105with cubic root chirping. Finally, as 40km is the maximum link length proposed between Base-Stations and Base-Band Unit pool in C-RAN 5G networks, therefore linear chirping is the best candidate compared to other methods.
KW - Chirping methods
KW - Dispersion Compensation
KW - Fiber Bragg Grating
KW - Fiber Optics
KW - Optisystem
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85182520527
U2 - 10.1109/ICESAT58213.2023.10347299
DO - 10.1109/ICESAT58213.2023.10347299
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85182520527
T3 - International Conference on Engineering, Science and Advanced Technology, ICESAT 2023
SP - 59
EP - 64
BT - International Conference on Engineering, Science and Advanced Technology, ICESAT 2023
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2023 International Conference on Engineering, Science and Advanced Technology, ICESAT 2023
Y2 - 21 June 2023 through 22 June 2023
ER -