Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Knowledge strategy in organizations: Refining the model of Hansen, Nohria and Tierney

  • University of Melbourne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

108 Scopus citations

Abstract

We assessed the model of knowledge strategy and IT support proposed by Hansen, Nohria and Tierney. Their main argument is that, in order to enable effective use of knowledge, organizations should select an 80/20 knowledge strategy mix of codification and personalization with one of these strategies dominant. We examined the knowledge strategy emphasis (codification or personalization) in each of four case organizations. These organizations represented different combinations of the codification and personalization knowledge strategy mix. Our cases indicate some support for Hansen et al.'s main argument, but also highlight the need for refinements to their model. Based on our assessment, we conclude that the advice of Hansen et al. is useful for deciding upon an initial strategic direction and setting suitable priorities. We propose the following refinements to the model. First, organizations may find it necessary to evolve their knowledge strategy mix over time, augmenting the alternate strategy as a result of the intertwined nature of knowledge processes. Second, we propose two strategic pathways that organizations could adopt on their journey towards effective use of organizational knowledge. Lastly, we identify additional considerations for deciding upon a particular knowledge strategy direction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)201-222
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Strategic Information Systems
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2004
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Codification
  • IT infrastructure
  • Knowledge strategy
  • Personalization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Knowledge strategy in organizations: Refining the model of Hansen, Nohria and Tierney'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this