Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Improving fairness by cooperative communications and selection of critical users

  • Juan Awad
  • , Mohammad A. Imran
  • , Rahim Tafazolli
  • University of Surrey

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Cooperative Transmission can be used in a multicell scenario where base stations are connected to a central processing unit. This cooperation can be used to improve the fairness for users with bad channel conditions-critical users. This paper will look into using cooperative transmission alongside the orthogonal OFDM scheme to improve fairness by careful selection of critical users and a resource allocation and resource division between the two schemes. A solution for power and subcarrier allocations is provided together with a solution for the selection of the critical users. Simulation results are provided to show the fairness achieved by the proposed critical users selection method, resource allocation and the resource division method applied under the stated assumptions.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationIWCMC 2011 - 7th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference
Pages184-188
Number of pages5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes
Event7th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference, IWCMC 2011 - Istanbul, Turkey
Duration: 4 Jul 2011 → 8 Jul 2011

Publication series

NameIWCMC 2011 - 7th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference

Conference

Conference7th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference, IWCMC 2011
Country/TerritoryTurkey
CityIstanbul
Period4/07/11 → 8/07/11

Keywords

  • Cooperative Communications
  • Critical Users
  • Fairness
  • Radio Resource Allocation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving fairness by cooperative communications and selection of critical users'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this