Abstract
ABSTRACT: The standard Hecksher-Ohlin-Samuelson framework claimed that foreign trade benefits developing countries, but many empirical studies suggest otherwise. After analyzing data on income deciles from the World Income Distribution Database for 66 developing countries, we found that trade openness benefits underprivileged people in affluent countries but not in developing countries. Also, external financial flows and democracy in conjunction do not exert significant effects, suggesting that these variables might affect income distribution through different channels. Finally, we reinforce the Kuznets inverted-U hypothesis; namely, the presence of an economic development threshold beyond which low-income deciles would increase.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 132-158 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | International Trade Journal |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 14 Mar 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- Foreign aid
- income distribution
- international factor movements
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How Can Globalization Affect Income Distribution? Evidence from Developing Countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver