Abstract
Past studies have shown the efficacy of flipped classrooms and gamification learning approaches. However, we know little about the blend of these learning approaches. This study compares the effectiveness of gamified flipped classrooms (GFC) to traditional classroom (TC) learning approaches. We study two different undergraduate cohorts over six-week course delivery in management and IT in a university in UAE. We collected data through an online survey from 105 students (control and experimental) and performed interviews with two focus groups of students. We identified the GFC learning approach as more efficient in terms of complexity of the technique, task orientation, student engagement, satisfaction, knowledge, and learning motivation. We also found a slight difference between the two approaches in terms of student skill development. Surprisingly, the control group achieved better course learning outcomes through TC than the experimental group using GFC because of perceived content relevance. The study provides additional evidence on the relevance of employing mixed learning approaches in classrooms, not to rely on one approach of university lecturers and learning enhancement units solely.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 100595 |
| Journal | International Journal of Management Education |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2022 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- ARCS model
- Content relevance
- Flipped classroom
- Gamification
- Interviews
- Non-parametric test
- Online survey
- Perceived usefulness
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Gamified flipped classroom versus traditional classroom learning: Which approach is more efficient in business education?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver