Abstract
This research reports on the buffering effects of two proactive crisis communication strategies: pre-crisis engagement and stealing thunder. Pre-crisis engagement is an organization's strategy to engage with stakeholders’ petitions before a negative event escalates into a crisis while stealing thunder is an organization's voluntary revelation of a crisis before it is revealed by a third party such as new media. The results showed that the effectiveness of pre-crisis engagement with stakeholder petitions was moderated by stealing thunder such that the effects of pre-crisis engagement were stronger when the organization stole the thunder. A moderated mediation model explored the underlying mechanism in which crisis responsibility mediated the interaction effects between pre-crisis engagement and stealing thunder.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 101930 |
| Journal | Public Relations Review |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2021 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Crisis engagement
- Crisis responsibility
- Organizational crisis
- Stealing thunder
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Fixing the barn door before the horse bolts: Effects of pre-crisis engagement and stealing thunder in crisis communication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver