Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Excluded-stomach Perforation after Roux-en-Y and One-anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Systematic Review with Video-illustrated Case Report

  • Mohamed Hany
  • , Ala Wafa
  • , Mona S. Youssef
  • , Mohamed H. Zidan
  • , Hashem Altabbaa
  • , Hazem Al-Momani
  • , Dina M. Hafez
  • , Walid El Ansari
  • , Mohamed Samir
  • Alexandria University
  • Madina Women’s Hospital
  • Misurata University
  • Al Basheer Hospital
  • The Research Papyrus Lab
  • NMC Royal Khalifa Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Gastric remnant or duodenal perforation after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is rare and may be missed radiologically. We systematically reviewed PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science and included 26 reports (34 patients), alongside a video-illustrated late OAGB case. Mean age was 49 years, 73.5% were female, and BMI at presentation was 33.58 kg/m²; 32 events followed RYGB and 2 OAGB, occurring a mean of 118.7 months postoperatively. CT was performed in 79.4% and more often showed free fluid than pneumoperitoneum. Laparoscopy (70.6%) with primary repair with or without omental flap or limited remnant resection achieved source control; no completion gastrectomies or 30-day deaths were reported. Early diagnostic laparoscopy should be considered in septic bypass patients with unexplained free fluid; however, the available evidence is limited to case reports and small case series, so definitive conclusions regarding incidence, comparative risk, or causative mechanisms cannot be drawn.

Original languageEnglish
JournalObesity Surgery
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2026

Keywords

  • Bariatric surgery complications
  • Excluded stomach
  • Gastric remnant perforation
  • One-anastomosis gastric bypass
  • Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Excluded-stomach Perforation after Roux-en-Y and One-anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Systematic Review with Video-illustrated Case Report'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this