Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluating infection prevention and control programs in Zambian hospitals using the WHO infection prevention and control assessment framework tool

  • Steward Mudenda
  • , Joseph Yamweka Chizimu
  • , Linus Ndegwa
  • , Maisa Kasanga
  • , Ilunga Mutwale
  • , Aubrey Chichonyi Kalungia
  • , Evelyn Wesangula
  • , Adriano Focus Lubanga
  • , James C.L. Mwansa
  • , Martha Mwaba
  • , Amos Yared Massele
  • , Nyambe Sinyange
  • , Tapfumanei Mashe
  • , Malambo Mutila
  • , Paul Simujayang’ombe
  • , David Lowrance
  • , Kaunda Yamba
  • , Misheck Shawa
  • , Chie Nakajima
  • , Yasuhiko Suzuki
  • John Bwalya Muma, Massimo Sartelli, Brian Godman, Roma Chilengi
  • Zambia National Public Health Institute
  • University of Zambia
  • Pharmaceutical Society of Zambia
  • Infection Prevention Network-Kenya (IPNET-Kenya)
  • University Teaching Hospital Lusaka
  • Kanyama Level 1 Hospital
  • East
  • Clinical Research Education and Management Services (CREAMS)
  • Kamuzu Central Hospital
  • Lusaka Apex Medical University
  • Zambian Ministry of Health
  • Sinazeze Hills Mini Hospital
  • Kairuki University
  • World Health Organization
  • The Global Fund
  • Action on Antibiotic Resistance (ReAct) Africa
  • Hokkaido University
  • Macerata Hospital
  • Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University
  • University of Strathclyde
  • City St George's, University of London

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) is key to preventing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study evaluated the implementation of IPC in Zambian hospitals. Materials and methods: We conducted a multicentric cross-sectional study in nine hospitals across Zambia using the WHO IPCAF tool. Data were collected from September 1 to 30, 2024 and analyzed using the self-scoring Excel and IBM SPSS version 25.0. Results: Out of the nine hospitals assessed, four were tertiary-level hospitals while the rest were secondary-level hospitals. Overall, the implementation of IPC core components was intermediate (IPCAF Score of 594 out of 800). Four hospitals had IPCAF scores between 401 and 600, indicating an intermediate level of IPC implementation. Five hospitals scored between 601 and 800, indicating an advanced implementation of IPC in these hospitals. Three tertiary hospitals scored between 601 and 800, demonstrating their advanced implementation of IPC core components. Conclusion: This study found that the overall implementation of IPC in the surveyed hospitals was intermediate, indicating that further improvements were needed. There is a need to provide peer-learning support and strengthen IPC implementation to respond to new or re-emerging infections and AMR in the country and beyond.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1642119
JournalFrontiers in Public Health
Volume13
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • IPCAF
  • Zambia
  • antimicrobial resistance
  • healthcare-associated infections
  • infection prevention and control

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating infection prevention and control programs in Zambian hospitals using the WHO infection prevention and control assessment framework tool'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this