Abstract
Based on a study of five W.K. Kellogg Foundation-funded educational partnerships, this article reports the stakeholders’ views on five sets of anticipated outcomes: health professions education impact, curricula and services, students, community and policy, and sustainability and structural change outcomes. The participants had a reasonable degree of certainty that their partnerships would achieve the intended outcomes. Using tightly defined " specific” stakeholder groups for the analyses reflected a more precise picture than employing " generic” groups. Partner groups that perceived greater certainty about the outcomes had higher scores on other related partnership parameters. For partnership working, the article proposes an orbital hypothesis of stakeholders’ perceptions for further investigation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 136-156 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Journal of Public Health Management and Practice |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2003 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Citizen participation
- Coalitions
- Community involvement
- Evaluation
- Joint working
- Partnerships
- Stakeholder perspectives
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Educational partnerships for public health: Do stakeholders perceive similar outcomes?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver