Abstract
We examine whether US firms prefer to use operating leases to purchase assets when faced with elevated climate policy uncertainty (CPU). Using a sample of 83,666 firm-year observations from 2000 to 2017, we find that CPU exhibits a significant positive relationship with operating lease intensity. The findings are robust to alternative lease and CPU proxies and alternative model specifications. Additionally, we find that financially constrained and environmentally exposed firms are more likely to increase their operating lease intensity during periods of tighter CPU. Consistent with the hedging property of leasing described by Smith (1979), leasing allows firms to form an ideal hedge against asset ownership when exposed to heightened risks induced by CPU. The findings are also consistent with financial contracting motivation (Smith Jr & Wakeman, 1985), suggesting that firms faced with greater CPU depend on leasing to avoid the higher cost of debt financing.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 104647 |
| Journal | International Review of Economics and Finance |
| Volume | 104 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- Climate policy uncertainty
- Debt capacity
- Operating leases
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Does climate policy uncertainty affect a firm's lease versus buy decision? Evidence from the US'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver