Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clinical Outcomes of Coronectomy: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

  • Queen Mary University of London
  • Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to review the current evidence on the clinical outcomes of coronectomy. Methods: A study protocol was developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Guideline for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR) and registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under Registration No. CRD4202450552. Furthermore, the reporting of the present systematic review was performed based on the PRISMA checklist. Results: Our search strategy yielded 577 articles. Of these, 213 were duplicate studies, and 364 were independently reviewed by two authors for eligibility. Of these, 349 were excluded based on the title and abstract. Fifteen articles were assessed for eligibility; 7 studies were excluded as they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Finally, a total of 8 systematic reviews met the criteria for inclusion, and they were critically reviewed. Conclusion: This overview of systematic reviews quantified the incidence of key clinical outcomes following coronectomy for mandibular third molars. The pooled data show a low incidence of inferior alveolar nerve injury (0.55%) and relatively low rates of postoperative complications including pain (10.67%), root migration (7.23%), re-operation (2.95%) and infection (2.49%). Less common events such as residual enamel (0.08%) and lingual nerve injury (0.086%) were infrequently reported.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)88-97
Number of pages10
JournalOral Surgery
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2026

Keywords

  • coronectomy
  • meta-analysis
  • systematic review
  • third molar surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical Outcomes of Coronectomy: An Overview of Systematic Reviews'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this