Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Apical debris extrusion by novel endostar e5 compared to other commercial rotary files: An in vitro study

  • BYL Nair Charitable Hospital & TN Medical College
  • Sir Hurkisondas Nurrotumdas Hospital & Research Centre
  • College of Dentistry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To compare the amount of apical debris extrusion in samples instrumented by EndoStar E5, ProTaper Universal, and M-two rotary files. Material and Methods: Forty-five freshly extracted non-carious mandibular premolar teeth with single roots and single canals were acquired, and randomly divided into 3 groups (n=15). Samples in Groups 1, 2, and 3 were instrumented using EndoStar E5 (EE5), ProTaper Universal (PTU), and M-two (MTO) rotary file, respectively. Following instrumentation, the debris extruded was collected in pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes and stored in an incubator at 70°C for 5 days. Tubes containing the dry extruded debris were then weighed. One-way analysis of variance was applied to the weights obtained followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for multiple comparison. Results: The mean debris extruded (mg) for the 3 groups were 1.23 (±0.72), 2.16 (±0.66), and 1.39 (±0.86) for EE5, PTU, and MTO respectively. Samples instrumented with PTU were associated with significantly higher debris extrusion (p<0.01) compared to EE5 and MTO. The groups EE5 and MTO did not differ in the amounts of debris extrusion (p>0.05). Conclusion: The novel EE5 and M-two rotary files result in less debris extrusion compared to PTU in mandibular premolars.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere4651
JournalPesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Endodontics
  • Root canal preparation
  • Root canal therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Apical debris extrusion by novel endostar e5 compared to other commercial rotary files: An in vitro study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this